Method for predetermining the volume represented by a shaded record



Nov. 19, 1940. COOK 2,222,069

. METHOD FOR PREDEIERMINING THE VOLUME REPRESENTED BY A SHADED RECORD Original Filed March 6, 1939 5 Sheets-Sheet l INVENTOR.

EVERETT J.c00|

ATTORNE" Nov. 19, 1940. E. J. COOK 2,222,069

METHOD FOR PREDEITERMINING THE VOLUME REPRESENTED BY A SHADED RECORD Original Filed March 6, 1939 5 Sheets-Sheet 2 s 3 INVENTOR.

ATTORNES E. J. COOK NW1. 19, 194W.

METHOD FOR PREDETERMINING THE VOLUME REPRESENTED BY A SHADED RECORD 5 Sheets-Sheet 5 firiginal Filed March 6, 1939 INVENTOR.

EVERETT J. COOK 19, 1940. E. J. COOK 2.222969 METHOD FOR PREDETERMINING THE VOLUME REPRESENTED BY A SHADED RECORD Original Filed March 6, 1939 5 Sheets-Sheet 4 NW EN TOR.

Nov. 19, 1940.

METHOD FOR PREDETERMINING THE VOLUME REPRESENTED BY A SHADED RECORD FIGJO.

E. J. COOK 2,222,069

Original Filed March 6, 1939 5 Sheets-Sheet 5 FIG.9.

EVERET J. 00K

'ATTORNEY Patented Nov. 19, 1940 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE METHOD FOR- PREDETERMINING THE VOL- UME REPRESENTED BY A SHADED REC- Everett J. Cook, Toledo, Ohio, aasignor to H. H. Buggie & Company, Toledo, Ohio, a corporation Original application'March 6, 1939, Serial No.

Divided and this application Novemher 6, 1939, Serial No. 303,167

5 Claims,

pattern to control a tool. This application is a division of my copending application Serial No. 260,240, filed March 6, 1939.

It has been proposed to fashion a work blank to reproduce a replica of a model by scanning the model with an optical unit including a light sensitive cell responsive to changes in contour of the pattern and variations in shading of a record on the model to control relative movement of the work blank and cutting tool in a manner to fashion the work blank to form a replica of the model. In cases where it is desirable or essential to accurately reproduce the model to a predetermined dimension, it is necessary to compensate for the extent of cut of the tool effected by the shaded decoration when initially setting the tool relative to the work blank, otherwise an error is introduced equal to the variation in out of the tool caused by the shading of the record on the model.

The present invention finds particular utility in manufacturing molds for bottles and the like where it is essential to accurately form the mold to a predetermined cubic capacity so that the resulting bottle will possess the required volume. It is a fairly simple matter to determine the general capacity of the mold by displacing the model from which the mold is formed, but this procedure is of no value in determining the additional capacity effected by cutting a replica of the shaded record on the pattern in the mold. The problem of determining the additional capacity represented by the shaded record is complicated by reason of theiact that the depth of out of the.

decoration in the mold varies as the shading of the record on the model varies. It is, therefore, one of the principal objects of this invention to provide a method rendering it possible to accu' rately predetermine the additional volume represented by the decoration or shaded record on the pattern, and to relatively position the tool and work blank to compensate for the additional volume created by the decoration so that the resulting' mold will have the desired volume, regardless of the displacement of the model.

In accordance with this invention, successive areas of the surface of the model are scanned by an optical system including a light sensitive cell in a manner that the resistance oi the cell varies as the light intensity reflected from the different areas of the model varies, and the resulting change in electrical current passing through the cell is measured by a meter, such as a microammeter. The readings of diiferent areas scanned by the optical system are compared with readings previously noted from charts showing meter readings for unit areas of ashade which has been predetermined to effect a definite depth of cut of the tool in the work blank. For examme, the meter reading for one area on'the surface of the model scanned is noted and compared with the preformed chart to determine the number of square inches of the known shade this reading corresponds to, the known shade being the one referred to as effecting the definite depth of cut aforesaid. It follows, therefore, that the volume of the shaded record on the pattern may be accurately obtained by multiplying the depth of cut effected by the known shade by the sum of the unit areas corresponding to the various microammeter readings obtained from the model.

In the present instance, the volume represented by the shaded record is added to the displacement volume of the model and subtracted from the predetermined desired volume of the mold. The result is divided by the area of the surface of the model, and this result represents the adjustment of the tool required to accurately form the mold to the predetermined desired volume.

In addition to the foregoing, the present invention contemplates relatively simple and inexpensive mechanism for carrying out the several steps of the improved method outlined above.

The foregoing, as well as other objects, will be made more apparent as this description proceeds, especially when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein: I

Figure l is a top plan view of a portion of a reproducing machine to which my improved method and apparatus is applicable;

Figure 2 is a sectional view taken substantially on the plane indicated by the line 2-2 of Figure 1;

Figure 3 is a semi-diagrammatic sectional plan view of the optical system employed to scan the pattern;

Figure l is a sectional view taken substantially on the plane indicated by the line 4-4 of Figure 2;

Figure 5 is an elevational view of the pattern employed in the reproducing machine illustrated Figure 1;

novel apparatus employed in carrying out the method; c

Figure 7 is a side elevational view, partly in section, of the construction shown in Figure 6;

5 Figure 8 is a side elevational view, partly in section, illustrating the mounting of a gauge employed in initially setting the tool relative to the work blank;

Figure 9 is a sectional view disclosing the means for accurately positioning the tool relative to the work blank;

Figure 10 is a diagram of an electrical circuit employed in the apparatus shown in Figure 6;

Figure 11 is a diagrammatic view illustrating a chart used in the present method;

Figure 12 is a sectional view taken substantially on the plane indicated by the line l2i2 of Figure 2.

For the purpose of' illustrating one application of the improved method forming the subject matter of this invention, I have selected a reproducing machine for fashioning a mold cavity in a work blank to the exact size and shape of the article it is desired to cast, although it will be understood as this description proceeds that the present invention is not limited to this specific application. As a matter of fact, the method and apparatus forming the subject matter of this invention may be advantageously employed in all cases where the accuracy of the resulting product necessitates compensating for the depth of cut represented by a shaded record to be reproduced on or in the work blank.

Inasmuch as the reproducing machine shown herein is solely for the purpose of illustrating one typical application of my improved method, it is not believed necessary to describe the same in detail. In general, it will be noted from Figure 1 that the machine comprises a work support I 40 and a pattern support Il mounted in side by side relationship on a traversing carriage l2 for oscillationby mechanism (not shown herein), but which may be the same as illustrated in y Patent No. 2,154,974, dated April 18, 1939. A

45 pattern A having a shaded record A thereon is mounted on the support I Ifor oscillationtherewith as a unit and a work blank B is secured to the support ID for movement with the latter. The pattern corresponds to the article it is desired to 0 cast in the mold cavity to be formed in the work blank B and is preferably formed of or coated with a material which is impenetrable by light.

The shaded record A, on the other hand, may be a photograph, sketch, or print of the decoration or printing it is desired to apply to the article to be cast in the completed mold. However, particularly satisfactory results have been secured by forming a negative of the shaded record on stripping film in very much the same manner as is ordinarily practiced in photoengraving and, in

case the record is in the form of a shaded sketch,

a half-tone screen, similar to the one used in photoengraving, is preferably employed. Prior to placing the negative on the surface of the model, this surface is thoroughly cleaned and coated with a silver emulsion of the type commonly employed in photographing processes. The

negative is then subjected to a bath of benzene 70 and, after being placed on the model, is exposed to light. Upon completion of the proper exposure, the negatives are removed and a coating of ink is applied to the model in accordance with the electroplating practice. The emulsion is then de- 75 veloped and the unexposed parts are removed by I between the passage 24 and the port 33 communia solution commonly known as "hypo", or some equivalent agent.

In the present instance, the outer halfof the surface of the pattern A is scanned by an optical unit D and the latter controls the move- 6 ments of a tool C positioned at the inner side of the work blank B opposite the latter. Both the tool C and optical unit D are mounted on the forward end of a ram l4 supported for reciprocation toward and away from the traversing carriage I2. The optical unit D is positioned opposite the pattern A at the outer side of the latter on an arm l5 having the inner end secured to the forward end of the ram so that movement of the ram in a direction toward the carriage i2 effects a corresponding movement of the optical unit D away from the pattern A. The tool C, on the other hand, is mounted on a spindle l6 driven by an electric motor I! secured directly to the ram so that movement of the latter toward 20 the carriage l2 effects a movement of the tool C toward the work blank B. In other words, the arrangement is such that'the tool C is fed into the work by the ram l4 when the optical unit D is moved by the ram away from the patem A.

Upon reference to Figure 2, it will be noted that the ram i4 is operated by fluid pressure in dependence upon the operation of a valve 18 controlled by an electromagnet l9. The particular construction of the ram illustrated herein is the same in construction as the one shown in my co- ,pending application, Serial No. 195,925, filed March 4, 1938, and forms no part of this invention. Briefly described, the ram is triangular in cross section and slides in a casing 20 corresponding to the ram in cross section, as shown in Figure 4. A set of needle bearings 2| is supported between the opposed parallel walls of the ram l4 and casing 20 to reduce friction to a minimum. In addition, the ram is provided with a cylinder 22 slidably receiving a piston 23, which is fixedly secured to the frame of the machine against movement and is axially bored to provide the passage 24 therethrough. The rear end of the bore or passage 24 alternately communicates with a source of fluid under pressure 25 and a fluid supply tank 26 through the valve l8. The inner end of the cylinder 22 is closed by and is secured to the head of the ram so that fluid under pressure sup plied to the cylinder 22 through the passage 24 in the piston 23 efiects a movement of the head together with the cylinder in a direction toward the traversing carriage l2. On the other hand, when the pressure in the passage 24 is exhausted by the valve 18, the ram is moved in the opposite direction by a suitable spring 21.

The valve I8 comprises a casing 28 having a bore 29 therethrough for slidably receiving a valve plunger 30. The valve plunger 30 is formed with a reduced portion 3| intermediate the ends thereof arranged in constant communication with the rear end of the passage 24 through the piston 23 by a conduit 32 and respectively establishes communication between the bore or passage 24 and ports 33 and 34 as the plunger 30 moves in opposite directions from the neutral position shown in Figure 2. The port 34 communicates with the discharge side of a suitable pump 35 located within a fluid supply tank 26 and the port 33 communicates with the tank 26. The arrangement is such that movement of the plunger 30 in the direction of the arrow 31 from the position shown in Figure 2 establishes communication piston 23, and the port 34 communicating with the pump 35. As a result, fluid under pressure is built up in the passage 24 and the ram is moved by fluid pressure against the action of the spring 21 in a direction to feed the tool C into the work B and to move the optical unit away from the attern A. v

In the illustrated embodiment of the invention, the valve plunger is moved in a direction to withdraw the tool from the work by energizinga load coil 39 of the electromagnet I9 and is moved in the opposite direction to eifect feeding of the tool into the work by a spring 4| acting on the armature 42 of the electromagnet to resist movement of the load coil 39 into the magnetic field 43.

lhe operation of the electromagnet is con trolled by the optical unit D in accordance with changes in shape of the surface of the pattern scanned and in dependence upon variations in. shading of the record A on the pattern A. The optical unit D comprises a light projector E and a light sensitive cell device F supported on the arm iii in fixed angular relation .to the projector. The light projector E has a source of illumination G housed by a casing H and registering with the outer end of a lens barrel I having condenser lenses J secured in the outer end thereof and having objective lenses K secured in the inner end of the same. A plate or diaphragm M is located between the two lenses and is formed'with a slot L therethrough of a. shape predetermined to cast an illuminated image on the surface of the pattern A having a sharply defined contour line N.

The photoelectric cell device f is also provided with a lens barrel 0 having its axis in a common horizontal plane with the axis of the projector lens barrel I and having objective lenses P fixed in the inner end thereof. The axis of the lens a barrel 0 converges toward the axis of the projector lens barrel I and intersects the latter axis at a point spaced inwardly beyond the inner ends of the lens barrels for reasons to be more fully hereinafter set forth. lln addition, the photoelectic cell device F is provided with a light sensitive cell in the form of a phototube S supported in a suitable light tight casing joined with the outer end of the lens barrel 0 to receive light passing through the latter In this connection, it will be noted from Figure 3 that a plate Q is secured in the lens barrel 0 between the lenses P and the light sensitive cell S. This plate Q is provided with a restricted aperture R therethrough located substantially on the axis of the 5;, lens barrel 0 and may be properly termed the W the projector lens barrel I and the axis of the phototube lens barrel 0 are arranged in fixed angular relationship. The angle between these two axes is so determined that when the tool is properly set with reference to the work blank B,

- 75 the axes of the lens barrels intersect at the surface of the pattern A or, in other words, the aperture R straddles the contour line N of the image reflected from the pattern on the plate Q.

The entire surface of the pattern A to be reproduced in the work blank B is, of course, scanned by the optical unit D and exactly the same area of the work blank is necessarily traversed by the tool C. As stated above, the pattern support and work support are mounted on the traversing carriage l2. This carriage is movable back and forth by mechanism, not shown herein, and is also fed vertically by a carriage 44, generally shown in Figure 1. The carriage M is raised by a step by step movement and the means for accomplishing this result is not shown herein, but may be similar to the means provided for this purpose in my Patent No. 2,154,974, dated April 18, 1939. Reference has also been made to the fact that the work blank B and pattern A are oscillated about their vertical axes. This is particularly desirable in cases where the sides of the article to be formed are on a radius in that it renders it possible to maintain the tool substantially normal to the surface being out.

With the above in mind and remembering that the angle between the light beam and line of sight of the light sensitive cell remains constant throughout the traversing operation, it follows that as the surface of the pattern A approaches the optical unit D, the image reflected on the plate Q is shifted relative to the aperture R in a direction to diminish the intensity of light passing through the aperture R to the light sensitive cell S. Such action has the effect of reducing the current flowing through the load coil 39 of the electromagnet it to such an extent that the spring ll operates the valve it to supply fluid pressure to the passage lit in the ram l t and effect movement of the ram it in a direction to feed the tool C into the work. It will, of course, be understood that movement of the tool (3 in the above direction causes a corresponding movement of the optical unit D away from the pattern and this movement continues until the aperture R intercepts the illuminated portion of the image. through the aperture R is increased by interception of the aperture R with the illuminated portion of the image, the quantity of current flowing through the load coil of the electromagnet it is correspondingly increased and becomes suf iicient to counteract the spring ll and operate the valve iii to permit movement of the ram Ml in a direction to withdraw the tool C from the work by the spring fill. As a result, the aperture ft is maintained in straddling relationship with the contour line N and, since this contour line represents a section of the pattern as viewed from the light sensitive cell S, it follows that an exact replica of the surface of the pattern scanned is produced in the work blank B.

Having described the manner in which the shape of the surface of the pattern scanned is exactly reproduced in the work blank B, reference will now be made to the manner in which variations in shade of the record A affect the tool. Assuming, for the purpose of illustration,

' that the record is in the form of the sketch,

shown in Figure 5, as having light and dark portions it and it, it will be noted that when the dark or shaded portions 46 of the sketch are scanned by the light sensitive cell S, the light intensity intercepted by the cell is diminished sufficiently to effect'the drop in current flowing through the cell required to permit the spring iii its the intensity of light passingll to operate the valve II and eil'ect movement of the ram M by the action of fluid pressure in a direction to cause the tool to feed into the i work. On the other hand, when the light portions 45 of the sketch are scanned by the cell 8, the intensity of light intercepted by the photocell 8 is increased sufficiently to effect the increase in current flow through the cell-S required to counteract the spring 4| and operate the valve l8 to permit movement of the ram M by the spring 21 in a direction to withdraw the tool from the work. The arrangement is such that the decoration represented by the sketch is cut into the mold while the latter is shaped to the contour of the pattern.

In order to better illustrate the manner in which the tool is controlled by both the contour of the surface of the pattern A and variations in shading of the record A, attention is directed to Figure 5, wherein three positions of the light image cast by the projector on the surface of the pattern are shown with reference to the aperture R of the light sensitive cell S. In the two positions X and Y, the tool is controlled in accordance with the contour of the pattern in the manner set forth above and in the position Z the tool is controlled in accordance with variations in the shading of the record A. Assuming that the light image is in the position Z, it will be noted that the intensity of light escaping through the aperture R onto the cell S is reduced by an amount depending upon the depth of shade of the portion of the record scanned and, as a result, the current passing through the photocell S is correspondingly reduced. This reduction in current admits fluid under pressure into the passage 24 in the ram to feed the tool into the work to an extent depending upon the degree of shade of the record, or upon the drop in current flow through the cell S, and correspondingly moves the optical unit D away from the pattern to bring a greater area of the aperture R in registration with the illuminated portion of the image. Accordingly, as soon as the image and aperture R reach the position Y, the intensity of light passing through the aperture R onto the photocell S increases and causes the optical unit D to move toward the pattern A and the tool to move in a direction away from the work B. As a result, the area of the aperture R intercepting the illuminated portion of the image is reduced by an amount depending upon the extent of increased light intensity. It will be' understood from the above that the relationship between the aperture R and contour line N varies in dependence upon variation in the shading of the light reflecting surface of the model.

It may be pointed out that the current flowing through the light sensitive cell S is amplified by an amplifier of the general type illustrated and described in my copending application Serial No. 261,606, filed March 13, 1939. This amplifier is so balanced that the wattage in the output circuit controlling the electromagnet l9 increases and decreases as the light intensity reflected from the pattern increases and decreases. In other words, the depth of cut of the tool 0 will vary in dependence upon variations in the shading of the record A on the pattern A.

Method of predetermining volume represented by the shaded record When the reproducing machine described above is employed for the purpose of fashioning a bottle mold, for example, it is necessary to form the mold with' such a high degree of accuracy that the displacement of the mold will come within very close limits to a specified volume. The approximate volume of the mold may be readily determined by displacing the model in a liquid. However, this procedure will not include the volume of the decoration to be cut in the mold or, in other words, does not embody the volume represented by the shaded record A on the pattern A. In cases where the decoration covers a substantial area of the mold, the volume represented by the shaded record becomes an important item and, unless taken into consideration, will result in an error of substantial proportions in the completed mold. The present invention not only provides a relatively simple method of accurately obtaining the additional volume represented by the decoration or shaded record, but also includes the manner in which the resulting calculation may be employed to efiect the necessary adjustment of the tool to compensate for this additional volume.

In accordance with the present invention, the approximate volume of the mold is determined by displacing the model in a liquid, such as water, and this volume will be referred to for convenience as ab. Upon completion of this operation, the model is introduced to the apparatus shown in Figure 6 and successive portions of the area of the surface of the model scanned by the optical system D are scanned by a second optical system 50 in a manner to be more fully hereinafter set forth. The second optical system also includes a light sensitive cell 5| arranged to' intercept light reflected from the model in a manner that the resistance of the cell varies as the light intensity reflected from the different areas of the model varies. The resulting variations in electrical current flowing through the light sensitive cell 5| are amplified by an ampliher 52 having a microammeter 53 in the output circuit thereof so that the light intensity of each area of the model scanned by the light sensitive cell 5| may be read in terms of microamperes on the meter 53.

The meter reading for each area scanned by the light sensitive cell 51 is noted and compared with a preformed chart (shown in Figure 11) to determine the number of square inches of the standard shade this reading corresponds to. Referring more indetail to Figure 11, it will be noted that this figure illustrates a curve obtained by recording microammeter readings for different unit areas of a shade which has been found to effect a predetermined depth of out do when scanned by the light sensitive cell D. In this connection, it will be noted that the ordinates of the chart, illustrated in Figure 11, represent readings on the microammeter of the known or standard shade, and the abscissas of the chart represent the number of square inches of the standard shade used in obtaining the readings on the microammeter.

With the chart shown in Figure 11, it is a simple matter to take the microammeter readings obtained by successively scanning different areas of the model and interpret these readings in the equivalent number of square inches of the standard shade referred to above as effecting the depth of out do. For example, assuming that the microammeter reading for one area on the model is 30, it will be noted from the curve illustrated in Figure 11 that this reading corresponds to the reading obtained by scanning approximately one square inch of the standard shade.

This procedure is employed for each microammeter reading and the volume represented by the shaded record may be readily determined .by multiplying the sum of the readings, taken from the abscissas of the chart, by the known depth of cut effected by, the standard shade referred to above. For example, assuming that the depth of cut dc, effected by the standard shade, is .020

of an inch and assuming that the sum of the square inches of standard shade corresponding to the model readings is 37 square inches, it will be noted that the volume represented by the shaded record is equal to 37 multiplied by .020. The result of this calculation is cubic inch, and by adding this figure to the approximate volume ab which will be assumed as 62 cubic inches, the actual volume 62% cubic inches of the model is obtained.

After the additional volume represented by the shaded record is predetermined and added to the displacement volume of the model, the tool C is adjusted relative to the work blank support H to not only compensate for this additional vol-.- ume but, at the same time, to take up any difference that may exist between the specified volume of the mold and the sum of the model displacement and volume represented by the shaded record. Assuming that the specified volume of the mold is 62 cubic inches, it will be noted that the tool C must be adjusted relative to the work support so that it will fashion the work to provide a volume of 62% cubic inches, instead of 62% cubic inches. In other words, it will be necessary to subtract cubic inch from the calculated volumeof 62% cubic inches by adjusting the tool C relative to the work support. This is accomplished by determining the area of the surface of the model and dividing A cubic inch by this area. Assuming that the 40 area of the model is 50 square inches, it follows that the tool must be retracted from its normal setting .005 of an inch so that the mold cavity in the work blank will be cut .005 of an inch shallower than the depth of cut indicated by the normal setting of the tool. One method that has been found satisfactory fordetermining the area of the model consists in wrapping the model in tinfoil and cutting the tinfoil into pieces that can be measured easily with a planometer. It follows from the above that regardless of the dimensions of the model and irrespective of the shaded record on themodel, the mold will be cut to the specified capacity.

In Figures 8 and 9, I have shown the manner which the tool is initially set and also the means employed for accurately compensating for any difference between the specified volume of the mold and the calculated volume of the latter. Ininitially setting the tool relative to the work, a gauge 55 is mounted on the model support It prior to positioning the model A on this support. As shown in Figure 8, the lower end of the gauge 55 is positioned by a fixed 65 center 56 carried by the model holder 51 and the upper end of the gauge is positioned by a movable center 58 slidably'supported on the model holder 51. The portion of the outer surface of the gauge scanned by the optical unit D is re- 70 cessed to provide a surface 59 in a plane including both the axis of oscillation of the support ii and the axis of oscillation of the work support it.

In accordance with the present construction,

78 when the aperture R of the light sensitive cell s intersects'tlie contour line N of the image on the surface 59 of the gauge, the tool C is adjusted so that the cutting end thereof assumes a predetermined position with respect to the plane aforesaid. In the present instance, the tool C is properly adjusted relative to the plane aforesaid by adjusting the arm l5 relative to the ram M in the direction of movement of the ram. For reasons hereinbefore described, the optical unit D remains a fixed distance from the adjacent surface of the model or gauge 55 and, accordingly, any adjustment of the arm in a direction toward the ram will effect a movement of the tool toward the work support II by the fluid pressure while any adjustment of the arm in the opposite direction effects a movement of the tool C away from the work support II. In detail, it will be noted from Figure 12 that the arm I is slidable in ways 60 extending in the direction of movement of the ram [4 and carried by the head of the ram at one side of this head. A screw 6| is rotatably supported on the ram l4 and threadedly engages a nut 63 fixedly secured to the arm l5.- As a result, rotation of the screw 6| effects a sliding movement of the arm l5 relative to the'ram M in one direction or the other, depending upon the direction of rotation of the screw. Thus, by moving the arm l5 relative to the ram, the tool is moved either toward or away from the'plane including the axes of the supports l0 and H.

In Figure 9, I have illustrated means for accurately positioning the cutting end of the tool prior to securing the work blank to the support Hi. In detail, a work clamping fixture 65 is secured to the support [0 and is provided with an upwardly extending lip 66 having a vertical shoulder 61 machined to lie in the same plane previously described as including the axis of rotation of the work support it! and the axis of rotation of the pattern support II. In setting the tool C, a straight edge 68 is mounted on the fixture 65 against the shoulder 61 and this straight edge is provided with a micrometer, diagrammatically illustrated by the reference character 69 on thetop surface thereof opposite the cutting end of the tool C. The micrometer 69 is accurately adjusted to position the cutting end of the tool in proper relationship to the plane of the shoulder Bl. In the specific example given above, the micrometer is adjusted to project .005 of an'inch beyond the plane toward the tool so that the mold cavity will be cut .005 of an inch shallower than would be the case if the micrometer were adjusted to assume a position in the plane of the shoulder 61.

It follows from the above that the first step in adjusting the tool is to properly set the micrometer with reference to the plane aforesaid. The arm I5 is then adjusted relative to the ram until the cutting end of the tool engages the micrometer B9.

In order to simplify the adjustment and render the same accurate, a signal T0 is provided for indicating the interval the cutting end of the tool engages the micrometer B9. In the present instance, the signal lllis in the form of an electric light bulb connected in a circuit H with a sourcecof electrical supply 12. One end of this circuit is connected to the micrometer which is insulated from the straight edge 68, and the other end of the circuit is grounded on the machine. As a result, the tool C and micrometer 69 cooperate to form a switch in the circuit so that when the tool C engages the micrometer, the light 10 will be illuminated, indicating that the proper setting of the tool has been accomplished.

The accuracy of the setting is further increased by employing a gauge 55 formed of, or coated with the same material as the model. In this connection, it will be noted that although the material is substantially impenetrable by light, nevertheless, any penetration of light will, of course, affect the setting of the tool and by forming the gauge of the same material as the model, this error is automatically compensated for.

Apparatus for determining the volume represented by the shaded record In Figures 6 and 7, I have illustrated one type of apparatus that may be successfully used in determining the volume represented by the shaded record. In detail, the reference character 14 iilustrates a light, tight box or cabinet having the inner walls preferably painted to provide a coating which will not reflect light and having a screen 15, either formed of a material, or painted so that no light will be reflected therefrom. The interior of the box 14 at one side of the screen 15 is illuminated by a series of lamps, designated by the reference character 16 and the optical unit 50, previously referred to, is located in the box at the same side of the screen.

Mounted in the box 14, at the opposite side of the screen, is a support 11 for the model A to be used in forming the mold and the screen 15 is formed with an elongated relatively narrow aperture l8, opposite the model A. The aperture extends for substantially the full length of the critical dimension of the model and is shown in the specific embodiment of this invention as extending from the base of the neck of the bottle to the bottom of the latter. As a result, light entering the aperture 18 from the lamps 16 is reflected from the model through the aperture toward the optical unit D. In this connection, it will be noted that reflectors 8| are associated with the lamps to reflect the light toward the aperture 18 and prevent light from being cast directly from the lamps toward the optical unit. The optical unit 50 is provided with a lens barrel 83 equipped with a lens system 84 for focusing light reflected through the aperture .18 from the model on the light sensitive plate of the photoelectric cell 5|. The photoelectric cell 5| is housed in a casing 85 communicating with the end of the lens barrel to permit the light from the model to be intercepted by the cell. The resistance of the photoelectric cell 5! varies in dependence upon variations in the intensity of light from the surface of the model A through the aperture 18 and the electrical current flowing through the cell is amplified by the amplifier 52, shown in Figure 10 as having the microammeter 53 in the output circuit thereof. It follows'from the above that variations in current flowing through the light sensitive cell in accordance with changes in the intensity of light reflected from the surface of the pattern A through the aperture 18 are indicated by the microammeter 53.

The model A is rotatably supported behind the screen 15 on centers 19 and and is rotated by a step by step movement to bring successive portions of the surface of the model in registration with the aperture I8. Although any suitable means may be provided for intermittently rotating the model, I have found that more satisfactory results are obtained by manually rotating the same.

With the above apparatus, it will be noted that successive portions of the surface of the model containing the shaded record are scanned by the optical system 5| and during the intervals of rest of the model, the intensity of reflected light is noted in terms of microamperes from the meter 53. These readings are then compared with the chart shown in Figure 11 and the additional volume represented by the shaded record is determined in accordance with the foregoing method.

What I claim as my invention is:

1. Those steps in the method of determining the volume represented by a shaded record which consist in scanning the record with a light sensitive cell, determining the value of light intensity reflected from the record on the light sensitive cell, selecting a shade known to effect a certain depth of cut of a light sensitive cell controlled tool when the latter light sensitive cell intercepts light reflected from said known shade, determining the area of the known shade required to reflect the value aforesaid of light intensity, and multiplying the area of the known shade required to reflect the value of light intensity previously determined by the depth of cut of the tool effected by the known shade.

2. Those steps in the method of determining the volume represented by a shaded record on a pattern which consist in scanning successive portions of the surface of the pattern by a light sensitive cell to determine the value of light intensity reflected from each of said portions on the cell, selecting a shade known to effect a certain depth of cut of a light sensitive cell controlled tool when the light sensitive cell intercepts light reflected from said known shade, determining the respective areas of the known shade required to reflect the values of light intensities reflected from the different portions of the record, and multiplying the sum of the areas of the known shade by the depth of cut of the tool effected by the light reflected from the known shade.

3. Those steps in the method of determining the volume represented by a shaded record on a pattern which consist in scanning successive portions of the surface of the pattern by a light sensitive cell responsive to light reflected from said surface and electrically connected to a meter for measuring the current flowing through the light sensitive cell, recording the meter readings from each portion of the pattern surface scanned, selecting a shade known to effect a certain depth of cut of a light sensitive cell controlled tool when the latter cell intercepts light reflected from the known shade, determining the area of the known shade required to reflect a light intensity corresponding to the light intensity reflected from each portion of the pattern, and determining the volume represented by the shaded record on the pattern by multiplying the sum of the areas of the known shade by the depth of cut of the tool effected by scanning the known shade.

4. Those steps in the method of determining the volume represented by a shaded record which consist in scanning the record with a light sensitive cell, determining the value of light intensity reflected from the record on the light sensitive cell, selecting a shade which will reflect a known light intensity on a light sensitive cell, and determining the area of the known shade required to reflect the value of the light intensity reflected from the shaded record scanned by the I first mentioned light sensitive cell.

5, Those steps in the method of determining the volume represented by a shaded record on a pattern which consist in scanning successive portions of the surface of the pattern by a light sensitive cell to determine the value of light intensity reflected from each of said portions on the cell, se-

lecting a. shade which reflects a known value of light intensity on a light sensitive cell, and determining the areas of the known shade required to reflect the values of the light intensities reflected from the dlfierent portions of the shaded record. 6

EVERETT J. COOK. 

